<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Apps Twitter Hack Raises Red Flags on Password Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.basexblog.com/2009/07/16/google-apps-twitter-hack-raises-red-flags-on-password-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.basexblog.com/2009/07/16/google-apps-twitter-hack-raises-red-flags-on-password-security/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:06:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Spira</title>
		<link>http://www.basexblog.com/2009/07/16/google-apps-twitter-hack-raises-red-flags-on-password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Spira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.basexblog.com/?p=901#comment-838</guid>
		<description>While the publication of certain Twitter documents may be protected by the First Amendment (the best discussion of this is at http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/first-amendment-protects-techcrunchs-publication-some-hacked-twitter-documents), Twitter&#039;s experience nonetheless can serve as a warning for companies to implement stronger security in accessing documents, e-mail, and other corporate tools.

The use of biometrics such as a fingerprint reader (which is now a fairly inexpensive feature on many laptops)  is superior to trying to enforce a &quot;strong&quot; password policy but given that most people do not have computers with a fingerprint reader at this time, we&#039;ll probably have to make do with better passwords for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the publication of certain Twitter documents may be protected by the First Amendment (the best discussion of this is at <a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/first-amendment-protects-techcrunchs-publication-some-hacked-twitter-documents)" rel="nofollow">http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/first-amendment-protects-techcrunchs-publication-some-hacked-twitter-documents)</a>, Twitter&#8217;s experience nonetheless can serve as a warning for companies to implement stronger security in accessing documents, e-mail, and other corporate tools.</p>
<p>The use of biometrics such as a fingerprint reader (which is now a fairly inexpensive feature on many laptops)  is superior to trying to enforce a &#8220;strong&#8221; password policy but given that most people do not have computers with a fingerprint reader at this time, we&#8217;ll probably have to make do with better passwords for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
